U/
Available — Talks · Podcasts · Webinars

TALKS/TALK

AI AUTOMATED THE EASY PART. NOW WHAT?

Notes from the Sitecore City Tour Amsterdam — with Harpreet Bushell (Altudo). Most enterprise AI programmes are optimising the wrong 80% of the business.

· 6 min read· Sitecore City Tour, Amsterdam· Enterprise AI
Una Verhoeven and Harpreet Bushell on stage at the Sitecore City Tour, Amsterdam
Una Verhoeven and Harpreet Bushell (Altudo) — Sitecore City Tour, Amsterdam, 5 March 2026

Earlier this year, Harpreet Bushell and I took the stage at the Sitecore City Tour in Amsterdam to make a case that doesn't get made often enough on an event main stage: that most enterprise AI programmes are optimising the wrong 80% of the business. Here's the argument we walked the room through.

THE ADOPTION–IMPACT GAP

We opened with the number that frames everything else: 75% of enterprise employees now use AI weekly. Fewer than 20% of those organisations report measurable AI-driven revenue impact. High adoption alone doesn't guarantee business outcomes — and closing that gap takes a strategic approach, not another tool rollout.

CUSTOMERS HAVE CHANGED FASTER THAN YOU HAVE

Before we got to AI itself, we made the point that the real shift has already happened on the customer side. Enterprises are still catching up to behaviour that changed years ago:

 CustomerEnterprise AI usage
UsageDailyCommittee-approved
ExpectationsInstantRoadmapped
PersonalisationAssumedPlanned
SpeedReal-timeQuarterly

That's not a technology problem. That's an operating model problem.

THE EFFICIENCY TRAP

Most AI effort inside the enterprise is going into the 80% where everyone already focuses: build, migration, content structure, platform implementation. Useful work — but it's a cost line, not a growth line. The 20% where the value actually lives is conversion, acceleration, decisioning and revenue, and it's consistently the part organisations get to last, if at all.

Efficiency without revenue impact is just a cost cut.

WHY THE GAP EXISTS

We walked through four root causes we see repeatedly with customers:

FROM TOOLS TO ORCHESTRATION

We showed a live example of what this looks like once you move past single-tool automation: a site build and migration run not by one assistant but by a coordinated set of agents — analysing the existing site, working from templates, components and screenshots, checking Definition-of-Ready criteria for front end, back end and QA, generating prompts and stories, writing code, composing pages, migrating content, then running QA, reporting and accessibility scoring, with feedback loops back into the build step.

That wasn't one agent. That was orchestration.

A single agent is like a single employee with no manager, no process, and no accountability.

The point isn't buying more AI tools — it's building an AI operating model.

Una Verhoeven on stage at the Sitecore City Tour, Amsterdam
Making the case: efficiency without revenue impact is just a cost cut

THE BUSINESS VALUE FRAMEWORK

This is the lens we told the room to apply before starting the next AI project: identify the conversion friction, quantify the cost of that friction, deploy an agent at the friction point, then measure the business outcome — not a platform metric. This framework starts with the P&L, not the platform.

A FINTECH EXAMPLE: FROM SEARCH TO BOOKED MEETING

We closed the practical section with a fintech customer journey, tracing what happens today between a prospect's first search and a booked meeting, and where an agent placed at the right friction point turns that journey into a measurable conversion gain rather than a faster page load.

A STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR CLOSING THE GAP

We left the audience with four steps, in order:

NOW WHAT: NEXT STEPS

Close the gap. Turn adoption into advantage.

Also covered on the day: Jeroen Breuer, "My Sitecore City Tour Amsterdam 2026 highlights."

All talks →

MAKE
CONTACT.

04 / 04
Contact

One inbox. Read daily. Novel problems jump the line.

hello@unaverhoeven.com